Story: Lisa Swift
In September Burngreave New Deal made a public announcement that they would run out of money in December.
New Deal currently own Sorby House, Forum House and lease the Vestry Hall from the Council. While Forum House is currently empty, Sorby House provides office space for a number of local organisations and businesses, and the Vestry Hall hosts adult learning courses and projects.
Closing New Deal an option
At New Deal's partnership board meeting in October, the Executive Asset Manager, Jeremy Diskin explained that they were looking at a number of options including closing the New Deal organisation and selling all the buildings. If this happened, Government funding rules could mean all money spent on the buildings would have to be paid back: the total cost could be as much as £9million.
Sorby House losing money
New Deal’s partnership board, which includes local residents, preferred to attempt to keep just one building. They favour Sorby House, despite it running at a loss of £10,000 per month.
The Council are still the ‘accountable body’ and ultimately responsible for the New Deal programme, and are working with the New Deal board.
The Council told the Messenger, “Sorby House currently operates at a loss which is not sustainable to New Deal even if significant efficiency savings are made.
At the moment, options available to the Board include selling Sorby House or seeking to operate it with support from other sources if these can be found.”
New Deal hope to use money from the sale of several shops on Spital Hill to fill the shortfall – if the government agrees.
The future of the Vestry Hall
The Vestry Hall is leased from the Council so New Deal, who have spent £3 million on refurbishing the listed building, hope to hand back responsibility for running it.
The Council said, “It is anticipated that the Council would wish to ensure this building remains an accessible community building for local groups and local people and the Council has experience in managing such community buildings.”
No choice
New Deal sought the views of local residents at their meeting in October but only 20 residents attended. It was obvious that those present did not want to see any buildings on Spital Hill empty or boarded up but it was impossible for local residents to have a say when the decision was beyond their control and, in reality, that of the New Deal board.
Logged in users of the website can add comments to this page.
Login to this site if you'd like to add a comment. Sign-up for an account if you are not currently a member.